最佳经济型游戏玩家？惠普 Omen 16 笔记本电脑评测

评语 - 没有预算外观的预算玩家（大部分情况下）随着 Omen Max 取代高端机型的位置，惠普 2025 Omen 16 现在被定位为更经济实惠的机型。不过，你不会马上注意到这一点：它连贯的设计、稳固的输入设备和出色的 CPU/GPU 性能让人感觉它并不廉价。它是一款不折不扣的经济型游戏机。

Test device courtesy of HP

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

尽管如此，我们还是少走了一些弯路。惠普节省了 Wi-Fi 和 USB 端口，这是可以接受的。电池容量较小是另一个小的折衷。不过，最大的遗憾是显示屏--并不糟糕，但明显低于当今的标准，缺乏视觉冲击力。如果惠普在低端配置上也能提供更好的屏幕，那么 Omen 16 将很容易成为我们向预算有限的游戏玩家推荐的首选。

Pros+ 简洁、连贯的设计

+ 坚固的键盘和触摸板

+ 出色的 CPU/GPU 性能

+ 即使在负载情况下，表面温度也很低Cons- 易沾染指纹的表面

- 没有 USB 4、Thunderbolt 或 SD 读卡器

- 只有 Wi-Fi 6

- 不合格的显示屏，响应时间慢

- 广告泛滥的控制中心

- 单通道内存

- 电池容量相对较小

价格和供应情况我们的测试机由 notebooksbilliger.de 提供，目前售价为 999 欧元。

$16.99Fleshy Leaf CPU+GPU Cooling Fan Replacement for HP OMEN 16-K 16-N Pro TPN-Q280 0FPKK0000H DFS5K223052839 0FPKJ0000H DFS5L32G164865 N18090-001 N18091-001 DC5V$19.99BestParts New CPU+GPU Cooling 12V Fan Replacement for HP OMEN 16-K 16-N (Only for RTX3060 RTX3070) TPN-Q280 TPN-Q281, P/N: N18100-001 N18099-001 12V$23.59LAOKOEN New Cooling Fan for HP Victus 16-r 16-r0039tx 16-r0022ns TPN-C169 Laptop, for HP Omen Gaming Laptop 16-wd 16-wd0045nf p/n: N44738-001 MG75091V1-C180-S9A MG75091V1-C190-S9A Fan DC 12V

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

Table of Contents评语 - 没有预算外观的预算玩家（大部分情况下）规格外壳和连接性 - 时尚，但有所缩减输入设备 - 全新布局，熟悉的感觉显示屏 - 一些不错的选择，但我们的不在其中性能 - 性价比极高的游戏排放与动力 - 在压力下保持冷静可比较的替代品

我们的 Omen 16 测试配置包括 Ryzen 9 8940HX, RTX 5060、16 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘。虽然它不是最便宜的 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑，但其定价似乎仍然是预算与性能之间的一个不错的中间点。

惠普向更经济实惠的构建转变，这在 预兆 17(2024）上就已经可以明显看出惠普向更经济实惠的方向转变，而这款新的 Omen 16 显然也是在这一方向上继续前进。

规格

Omen 16 (Omen 16 Series)ProcessorAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX 16 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Dragon Range refresh (Zen 4)Graphics adapterNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, 115 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Gefprce 577.03, Optimus and MUXMemory16 GB , 1x 16 GB Samsung DDR5-5600Display16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 162 PPI, AUODBB2, IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 144 HzMainboardAMD Promontory/Bixby FCHStorageSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, 1000 GB , 860 GB freeSoundcardAMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio ControllerConnections2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Heaphone jackNetworkingRealtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 23.7 x 357.5 x 269Battery70 Wh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: HP True Vision 1080p FHD IR cameraPrimary Camera: 2 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: Dual speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet keyboard with 26-Key Rollover antighosting, 4-zone RGB backlit, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months WarrantyWeight2.397 kg, Power Supply: 770 g

Price1500 EuroLinksHP homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

外壳和连接性 - 时尚，但有所缩减今年的机身经过了重新设计：屏幕比例从 16:9 改为 16:10，从而使底部边框更加纤薄。尺寸略有变化--宽度减小，深度增加，厚度不变。显示屏可打开约 135 度，铰链有轻微晃动。

带有镜面 OMEN 徽标的整体黑色设计语言基本保持不变。与 去年更加圆润的机型新版本重新采用了一些更锐利的线条和边缘。

惠普将铝制底座改为全塑料结构。这使得它的刚性稍差，键盘面板可能会轻微弯曲，但问题不大。不过，指纹很快就会出现在深色的表面上。

尺寸比较

HP Omen 16 (2024) Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Alienware 16 Aurora Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) DIN A4 ❌

惠普还减少了端口：两个 Thunderbolt/USB 4 接口不见了。唯一的 USB-C 端口现在只支持 USB 3.2 Gen 2，而三个 USB-A 端口中的两个仍然是 Gen 1（5 Gbit/s）。也没有读卡器--类似于联想的 LOQ 15.

右侧USB-A (5 Gbitps)

左：USB-A（5 Gbitps）、USB-C（10 Gbitps）、耳机插孔

后部AC、LAN、HDMI 2.1、USB-A（10 Gbitps）

前方无端口无线连接性能也有所下降。惠普现在使用的不是 Wi-Fi 6E，而是 Realtek Wi-Fi 6 模块，传输速度一般。惠普 XMG 酷睿 15和 联想 LOQ 15显示出相似的结果。

Networking

iperf3 transmit AXE11000Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card

1820 (1746min, 1748.32P1 - 1921max) MBit/s +93%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

1392 (740min - 1497max) MBit/s +48%Average of class Gaming (469 - 1862, n=123, last 2 years)

1216 MBit/s +29%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngRealtek RTL8852BE

943 (903min - 985max) MBit/s Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

937 (766min - 1032max) MBit/s -1%HP Omen 17-db0079ngRealtek RTL8852BE

850 (782min - 874max) MBit/s -10%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Realtek RTL8852BE

823 (788min - 855max) MBit/s -13%Average Realtek RTL8852BE (536 - 943, n=66)

786 MBit/s -17% iperf3 receive AXE11000Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

1745 (1723min - 1765max) MBit/s +96%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card

1698 (1622min, 1630.7P1 - 1727max) MBit/s +91%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

1693 (1660min - 1709max) MBit/s +90%Average of class Gaming (680 - 1745, n=123, last 2 years)

1428 MBit/s +60%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Realtek RTL8852BE

935 (908min - 952max) MBit/s +5%HP Omen 17-db0079ngRealtek RTL8852BE

930 (466min - 946max) MBit/s +4%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngRealtek RTL8852BE

890 (438min - 961max) MBit/s Average Realtek RTL8852BE (455 - 985, n=67)

862 MBit/s -3%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø943 (903-985) HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (438-961)

19.6 ∆E11.7 ∆E21.8 ∆E22 ∆E16.5 ∆E12.4 ∆E16 ∆E25.8 ∆E15.4 ∆E17 ∆E11 ∆E10.1 ∆E31.2 ∆E20.2 ∆E19.8 ∆E9 ∆E12.3 ∆E30.4 ∆E3.9 ∆E9.4 ∆E13.2 ∆E17.9 ∆E23.3 ∆E15.6 ∆EColorChecker HP Omen 16-ap0091ng: 16.89 ∆E min: 3.89 - max: 31.25 ∆E

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng

可持续性惠普没有给出我们配置的精确数字。不过，15.6 英寸 Omen 16 的可持续发展报告指出，每台设备的二氧化碳排放量为 270-1,110 千克。惠普还声称在显示屏边框中使用了海洋塑料，在键帽中使用了可回收塑料，在铰链和底座等部件中使用了可回收金属。

虽然电源适配器仍用塑料包装，但包装大部分是纸板。

输入设备 - 全新布局，熟悉的感觉键盘布局发生了变化：现在有了数字小键盘，但方向键变小了，而且只有一半高度。按键间距略有缩小，右侧的 Ctrl 键被 Copilot 键取代。

4 区 RGB 背光提供两个亮度级别。惠普标榜 26 键防鬼键滚动功能。键程很短，但由于反馈阻尼良好，感觉比实际键程更深。打字快速、舒适、安静。

触摸板（12.5 × 8 厘米）具有出色的滑动性和精确的点击反馈。

Omen 16 2025 的键盘布局

Omen 16 2024 的键盘布局

RGB 背光

触摸板显示屏 - 一些不错的选择，但我们的不在其中子像素

右下角轻微背光出血惠普为 Omen 16 系列列出了多种显示屏选项。我们的评测机使用的是最弱的面板之一：1200p IPS 显示屏（300 尼特、144 赫兹、62.5% sRGB）。其他版本包括 Ryzen 7 配置的 1080p 300 尼特 100% sRGB 变体，以及 Ryzen AI 或 Intel Core Ultra 型号的 1600p 500 尼特 240 Hz 100% sRGB 面板。

我们的测量确认了 300 尼特的亮度和扎实的均匀性，不过我们注意到右下角有一个小光斑。对比度尚可，但色彩覆盖率较低--低于 60% sRGB，即使是其他经济型笔记本电脑现在也能超过这一水平。

好的一面是，虽然响应时间较慢，但没有出现 PWM 闪烁，这在类似的经济型设备上也能看到，如 LOQ 15或 Alienware 16 Aurora.

308cd/m²324cd/m²320cd/m²301cd/m²328cd/m²303cd/m²299cd/m²318cd/m²315cd/m²

Distribution of brightnessAUODBB2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 328 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 312.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16.1 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²Contrast: 1262:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.73 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}calibrated: 4.22ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.05 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}38.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)58.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)40% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.63CCT: 6718 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAUODBB2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 HzHP Omen 16 (2024)BOE BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1", 240 HzLenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 HzSchenker XMG Core 15 (M25)NE153QDM-NZ2 (BOE0D5F), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 300 HzLenovo LOQ 15AHP10CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 HzAlienware 16 AuroraBOE NE16N41, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 HzDisplay75%125%80%73%78% Display P3 Coverage (%)4068.6 72%99.9 150%71.7 79%67.3 68%70.8 77% sRGB Coverage (%)58.198.6 70%100 72%99.9 72%99.2 71%99.9 72% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)38.770.6 82%98.3 154%73.6 90%69.1 79%72.1 86%Response Times51%98%65%-16%-65% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)27.6 ?(12.9, 14.7)14.1 ?(6.7, 7.4) 49%0.42 ?(0.21, 0.21) 98%12.4 ?(5.8, 6.6) 55%33.9 ?(15.5, 18.4) -23%49.5 ?(23.1, 26.4) -79% Response Time Black / White * (ms)19.4 ?(9.6, 9.8)9.3 ?(4.6, 4.7) 52%0.4 ?(0.22, 0.18) 98%5 ?(1.4, 3.6) 74%21.2 ?(10.2, 11) -9%29.3 ?(14.2, 15.1) -51% PWM Frequency (Hz)1152 ?(44) PWM Amplitude * (%)11Screen15%54%15%30%10%Brightness middle (cd/m²)328292 -11%492 50%545 66%318 -3%345.3 5%Brightness (cd/m²)313291 -7%495 58%530 69%300 -4%324 4%Brightness Distribution (%)9185 -7%92 1%94 3%89 -2%88 -3%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.260.24 8%0.54 -108%0.2 23%0.23 12%Contrast (:1)12621217 -4%1009 -20%1590 26%1501 19%Colorchecker dE 2000 *4.732.36 50%0.9 81%2.29 52%1.33 72%3.22 32%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *17.474.08 77%1.8 90%5.42 69%4.42 75%5.68 67%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *4.220.93 78%1.05 75%0.94 78%0.93 78%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.053 -46%1.2 41%3.5 -71%1.9 7%4.5 -120%Gamma2.63 84%2.101 105%2.16 102%2.317 95%2.187 101%2.1 105%CCT6718 97%5976 109%6291 103%6957 93%6678 97%7041 92%Total Average (Program / Settings)47% /

33%92% /

81%53% /

36%29% /

33%8% /

14%* ... smaller is better

开箱后的色彩校准并不理想，色域有限，几乎没有改进的余地。只有灰度精度在校准后有明显改善。

灰度

饱和度

颜色检查器

灰度校准

饱和度校准

色彩校验仪已校准

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise↘ 9.8 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.9 ms rise↘ 14.7 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8084 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0 % 亮度25 % 亮度50 % 亮度亮度 75亮度为 100

在有遮荫的地方，室外能见度是可以接受的...

...但受限于 300 尼特的亮度。极端角度下亮度下降

直接查看

从下往上看视角很好性能 - 性价比极高的游戏我们的测试机型配备 AMD 的 Ryzen 9 8940HX和 Nvidia 的 RTX 5060以及 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘。这使它成为一款中高端游戏笔记本电脑，能够以原始分辨率流畅运行大多数游戏。

测试条件惠普没有将功能捆绑到一个应用程序中，而是预装了几个实用程序--支持助手、硬件诊断程序和 Omen Gaming Hub，在 Omen Gaming Hub 中可以调整性能模式（Eco、Balanced、Performance、Unleashed）和灯光设置。我们使用性能模式进行了所有基准测试。

不过，游戏中心充斥着大量广告和促销信息，包括刮刮卡和 "奖励"。它给人一种臃肿、迟钝的感觉，与其说是一个控制面板，还不如说是一个广告软件。

惠普支持助理

就连 Omen Gaming Hub 的主屏幕也不堪重负

这是一家廉价航空公司吗？右上角有刮刮卡广告

性能模式

性能模式

Cinebench R15

CPU TDP

3DMarkFire Strike 图形

赛博朋克 2077 Ultra

噪音 赛博朋克

释放

4,857

82 W

31,331

84.6 fps

52.7 dB

性能

4,296

73，降至 61 W

25,485

78.1 fps

49 dB

平衡

4,121

68，降至 56 W

26,919

65.4 fps

40.45 dB

生态

4,204

78，降至 56 W

13,800

60 fps

29 dB

电池

2,987

36 W

18,609

47 fps

31 dB

处理器......（英文 AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX(16 核、32 线程）在 Cinebench R15 循环测试中提供了强劲而稳定的性能，只有极少的节流现象。

在所有 CPU 基准测试中，它的表现都优于大多数竞争对手。它甚至超过了英特尔 i9-14900HX的持续性能，尽管初始突发性能大致相同。总体而言，它是一款性能卓越的 CPU。预计在电池电量不足的情况下，性能会降低约 40%。

Cinebench R15 多重测试

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX: Ø4084 (4037.14-4295.53) HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2939 (2630.37-4041.1) Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2777 (2734.48-2831.06) Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2683 (2542.1-2734.48) Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250: Ø2469 (2446.48-2543.88) Alienware 16 Aurora Intel Core 7 240H: Ø2461 (2417.65-2581.98)

CPU Performance rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance rating

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

83.6 pt HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

81 pt HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

77.3 pt Average of class Gaming

76.7 pt Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

65.3 pt Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

64.5 pt Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

60.9 pt Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

58.7 pt Cinebench R23 / Multi Core

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (27145 - 32521, n=2)

29833 Points +10%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

27145 Points HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

26660 Points -2%Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=148, last 2 years)

25205 Points -7%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

17712 Points -35%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

16588 (15918.5min - 16587.6max) Points -39%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

16154 Points -40%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

15751 Points -42%Cinebench R23 / Single Core

HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

2202 Points +15%Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=148, last 2 years)

1985 Points +4%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

1954 Points +2%Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (1917 - 1930, n=2)

1924 Points 0%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

1917 Points Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

1831 Points -4%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

1801 Points -6%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

1649 Points -14%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (10439 - 12720, n=2)

11580 Points +11%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

10439 Points HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

10077 Points -3%Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=147, last 2 years)

9721 Points -7%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

6969 Points -33%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

6386 Points -39%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

6320 Points -39%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

6144 Points -41%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)

HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

846 Points +14%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

772 Points +4%Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=147, last 2 years)

767 Points +3%Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (745 - 747, n=2)

746 Points 0%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

745 Points Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

703 Points -6%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

697 Points -6%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

694 Points -7%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (4296 - 5406, n=2)

4851 Points +13%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

4296 (4037.14min - 4295.53max) Points HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

4041 Points -6%Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=147, last 2 years)

3901 Points -9%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

2831 (2734.48min - 2831.06max) Points -34%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

2734 (2542.1min - 2734.48max) Points -36%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

2582 (2417.65min - 2581.98max) Points -40%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

2544 (2446.48min - 2543.88max) Points -41%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit

HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

311 Points +7%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

304 Points +4%Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=146, last 2 years)

294 Points +1%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

292 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (290 - 292, n=2)

291 Points 0%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

283 Points -3%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

279 Points -4%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

264 Points -10%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

204 Seconds * -76%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

195 Seconds * -68%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

183 Seconds * -58%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

182 Seconds * -57%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

162 Seconds * -40%Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=143, last 2 years)

154.5 Seconds * -33%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

116 Seconds * Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (101 - 116, n=2)

108.5 Seconds * +6%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (103455 - 133175, n=2)

118315 MIPS +14%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

103455 MIPS Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=145, last 2 years)

91131 MIPS -12%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

87555 MIPS -15%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

72888 MIPS -30%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

65058 MIPS -37%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

64653 MIPS -38%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

63475 MIPS -39%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1

HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

7407 MIPS Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (7360 - 7407, n=2)

7384 MIPS 0%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

7217 MIPS -3%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

6497 MIPS -12%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

6485 MIPS -12%Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=145, last 2 years)

6416 MIPS -13%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

6371 MIPS -14%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

5851 MIPS -21%Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core

HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

16490 Points +44%Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=145, last 2 years)

15689 Points +37%Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (11447 - 16362, n=3)

14666 Points +28%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

14194 Points +24%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

13681 Points +20%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

13349 Points +17%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

11447 Points Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

9956 Points -13%Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core

HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

3064 Points +9%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

2942 Points +4%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

2816 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (2767 - 2835, n=3)

2806 Points 0%Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3253, n=145, last 2 years)

2793 Points -1%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

2683 Points -5%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

2601 Points -8%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

2586 Points -8%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core

HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

18590 Points +39%Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=144, last 2 years)

16858 Points +26%Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (13357 - 19421, n=2)

16389 Points +23%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

13357 Points Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

12968 Points -3%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

12597 Points -6%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

12276 Points -8%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

9720 Points -27%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core

Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

2155 Points +10%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

2136 Points +9%Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=144, last 2 years)

2012 Points +3%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

1986 Points +1%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

1961 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (1925 - 1961, n=2)

1943 Points -1%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

1911 Points -3%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

1837 Points -6%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (25.7 - 36.2, n=2)

31 fps +21%Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=145, last 2 years)

27.2 fps +6%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

25.7 fps HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

22.8 fps -11%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

22.7 fps -12%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

22.4 fps -13%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

19 fps -26%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

18.1 fps -30%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF

Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

88.8 s * -93%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

53.5 s * -17%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

52.5 s * -14%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

49.6 s * -8%Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=144, last 2 years)

47.6 s * -4%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

45.9 s * HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

44.9 s * +2%Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (40.5 - 45.9, n=2)

43.2 s * +6%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean

Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H

0.4805 sec * -14%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250

0.4471 sec * -6%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260

0.4454 sec * -6%Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=146, last 2 years)

0.4279 sec * -2%Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (0.4215 - 0.4334, n=2)

0.4275 sec * -1%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

0.4215 sec * Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

0.4043 sec * +4%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX

0.3731 sec * +11%* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit4296 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit288 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit292 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)10439 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)745 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core1917 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core27145 Points

Help... in comparisonCinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparisonLenovo B50-30 (min)

N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)49 ...Lenovo LOQ 17IRX10 i7-14700HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop4248Eurocom Raptor X17 i9-13900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU4274Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU4280HP Omen 16-ap0091ng

R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop4296HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU4311Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU4320Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU4339 ...

(max)

TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation15842

Performance rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance rating

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

95.4 pt HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

86.9 pt Average of class Gaming

67 pt Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

61.8 pt Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

58.3 pt HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

55.6 pt Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

52.4 pt Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

41.8 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (43311 - 52718, n=2)

48015 KRay/s +11%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

43311 KRay/s Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

29330 KRay/s -32%Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=144, last 2 years)

28123 KRay/s -35%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

28112 KRay/s -35%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

24656 KRay/s -43%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

17684 KRay/s -59%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

14710 KRay/s -66%AIDA64 / FPU Julia

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (171374 - 212581, n=2)

191978 Points +12%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

171374 Points Average of class Gaming (35040 - 238426, n=144, last 2 years)

127182 Points -26%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

121427 Points -29%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

108991 Points -36%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

98709 Points -42%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

90778 Points -47%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

73294 Points -57%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (7988 - 9259, n=2)

8624 MB/s +8%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

7988 MB/s Average of class Gaming (1728 - 9817, n=144, last 2 years)

5857 MB/s -27%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

4980 MB/s -38%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

4563 MB/s -43%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

4399 MB/s -45%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

4367 MB/s -45%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

3036 MB/s -62%AIDA64 / CPU Queen

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (169334 - 172010, n=2)

170672 Points +1%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

169334 Points HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

129824 Points -23%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

123832 Points -27%Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=144, last 2 years)

118926 Points -30%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

114915 Points -32%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

86602 Points -49%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

76075 Points -55%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (26855 - 29514, n=2)

28185 Points +5%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

26855 Points Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

15328 Points -43%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

14798 Points -45%Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=144, last 2 years)

14202 Points -47%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

13856 Points -48%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

12268 Points -54%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

8803 Points -67%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (90684 - 113321, n=2)

102003 Points +12%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

90684 Points Average of class Gaming (17585 - 128721, n=144, last 2 years)

65663 Points -28%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

65308 Points -28%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

58771 Points -35%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

53836 Points -41%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

44165 Points -51%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

35982 Points -60%AIDA64 / CPU AES

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (150768 - 168749, n=2)

159759 MB/s +6%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

150768 MB/s Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=144, last 2 years)

108553 MB/s -28%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

89269 MB/s -41%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

87670 MB/s -42%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

68595 MB/s -55%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

68090 MB/s -55%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

61850 MB/s -59%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (1784 - 2092, n=2)

1938 MB/s +9%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

1784 MB/s Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=144, last 2 years)

1524 MB/s -15%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

1273 MB/s -29%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

1137 MB/s -36%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

1131 MB/s -37%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

1074 MB/s -40%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

895 MB/s -50%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace

Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (23193 - 28180, n=2)

25687 KRay/s +11%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

23193 KRay/s Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

15751 KRay/s -32%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

15203 KRay/s -34%Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=144, last 2 years)

15064 KRay/s -35%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

13039 KRay/s -44%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

9420 KRay/s -59%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

8056 KRay/s -65%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx

HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

49514 MPixel/s +171%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

45700 MPixel/s +150%Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=144, last 2 years)

43435 MPixel/s +138%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

40796 MPixel/s +123%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

39806 MPixel/s +118%Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (18283 - 34819, n=2)

26551 MPixel/s +45%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

23228 MPixel/s +27%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

18283 MPixel/s

系统性能日常性能感觉非常流畅。除了内存吞吐量受限于单通道内存（尽管延迟较低）外，其他基准测试成绩均符合目标值。

PCMark 10

Performance rating: Percent PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total Performance rating

HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

92.7 pt Average of class Gaming

83.2 pt HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

80.1 pt Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

80.1 pt Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

79.5 pt Alienware 16 Aurora -4! GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H

77 pt Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

71.3 pt Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) -3! GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

70.1 pt PCMark 10 / Score

HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

8915 Points +11%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

8241 Points +2%Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9667, n=123, last 2 years)

8069 Points 0%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

8054 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1)

8054 Points 0%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

7304 Points -9%PCMark 10 / Essentials

HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

11255 Points +5%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

10806 Points +1%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

10778 Points +1%Average of class Gaming (8810 - 12600, n=127, last 2 years)

10713 Points 0%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

10709 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1)

10709 Points 0%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

10292 Points -4%PCMark 10 / Productivity

HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

11410 Points +16%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

10163 Points +3%Average of class Gaming (6662 - 16716, n=123, last 2 years)

9909 Points +1%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

9831 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1)

9831 Points 0%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

9226 Points -6%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation

HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

14976 Points +11%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

13832 Points +3%Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=123, last 2 years)

13627 Points +1%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

13465 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1)

13465 Points 0%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

11137 Points -17%CrossMark / Overall

HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

2234 Points +17%Alienware 16 AuroraGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H

2016 Points +6%Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=118, last 2 years)

1984 Points +4%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

1903 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1)

1903 Points 0%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

1792 Points -6%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

1746 Points -8%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

1729 Points -9%CrossMark / Productivity

HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

2138 Points +17%Alienware 16 AuroraGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H

1910 Points +4%Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=118, last 2 years)

1862 Points +2%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

1831 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1)

1831 Points 0%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

1764 Points -4%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

1712 Points -6%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

1627 Points -11%CrossMark / Creativity

HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

2349 Points +11%Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=118, last 2 years)

2221 Points +5%Alienware 16 AuroraGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H

2115 Points 0%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

2112 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1)

2112 Points 0%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

1957 Points -7%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

1933 Points -8%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

1757 Points -17%CrossMark / Responsiveness

HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

2195 Points +41%Alienware 16 AuroraGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H

2054 Points +31%Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=118, last 2 years)

1726 Points +10%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

1664 Points +7%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

1580 Points +1%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

1562 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1)

1562 Points 0%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

1487 Points -5%WebXPRT 3 / Overall

HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

323 Points 0%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

322 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1)

322 Points 0%Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=123, last 2 years)

315 Points -2%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

308 Points -4%Alienware 16 AuroraGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H

295 Points -8%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

256 Points -20%WebXPRT 4 / Overall

HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

309 Points +22%Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=118, last 2 years)

283 Points +12%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

261 Points +3%Alienware 16 AuroraGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H

261 Points +3%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

253 Points Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1)

253 Points 0%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

193.1 Points -24%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total

Alienware 16 AuroraGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H

543 ms * -7%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

534 ms * -5%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

509 ms * Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1)

509 ms * -0%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

494 ms * +3%Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=132, last 2 years)

471 ms * +7%HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

437 ms * +14%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

434.2 ms * +15%* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score

8054 pointsHelp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy

HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

79039 MB/s +172%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

72639 MB/s +150%Average of class Gaming (21750 - 108104, n=144, last 2 years)

71814 MB/s +147%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

69413 MB/s +139%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

63992 MB/s +120%Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (29102 - 51173, n=2)

40138 MB/s +38%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

35838 MB/s +23%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

29102 MB/s AIDA64 / Memory Read

HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

86537 MB/s +143%Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=144, last 2 years)

74513 MB/s +109%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

69665 MB/s +96%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

62332 MB/s +75%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

60748 MB/s +70%Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (35634 - 62219, n=2)

48927 MB/s +37%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

35634 MB/s Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

30770 MB/s -14%AIDA64 / Memory Write

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

87114 MB/s +170%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

81805 MB/s +154%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

77715 MB/s +141%Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=144, last 2 years)

73721 MB/s +129%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

60252 MB/s +87%Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (32239 - 61929, n=2)

47084 MB/s +46%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

42376 MB/s +31%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

32239 MB/s AIDA64 / Memory Latency

Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

106.5 ns * -28%Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=144, last 2 years)

101.9 ns * -22%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

98.4 ns * -18%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

91.5 ns * -10%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

90.2 ns * -8%HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

84.1 ns * -1%Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (83.5 - 83.9, n=2)

83.7 ns * -0%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

83.5 ns * * ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟在浏览器使用过程中，延迟仍然较低，但在打开多个标签页时，延迟会激增--我们在 YouTube 测试中就掉了 16 帧。总体而言，与同类产品相比，延迟处于中等水平。

YouTube 测试

LatencyMon Main

LatencyMon 驱动程序

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6HGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, i7-13620H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

4219 μs * -196%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

2333 μs * -64%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

1425.3 μs * HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

1248.3 μs * +12%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

1229.6 μs * +14%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

842.8 μs * +41%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UPGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, R7 260, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00

563.8 μs * +60%* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器1 TB PCIe 4.0 三星固态硬盘具有稳定的持续性能和强劲的 Q8-T1 连续读取速度，但 4K 性能较弱，整体上落后于竞争对手。

Crystaldiskmark 6

AS 固态硬盘

AS SSD 复制

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:

7204 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:

5611 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:

443 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:

424 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:

59.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:

156.9 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:

404 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:

1013 MB/s

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1Sequential Read:

4595MB/s

Sequential Write:

3249MB/s

4K Read:

58.8MB/s

4K Write:

189.4MB/s

4K-64 Read:

866MB/s

4K-64 Write:

2532MB/s

Access Time Read:

0.098ms

Access Time Write:

0.022ms

Copy ISO:

2298.45MB/s

Copy Program:

756.42MB/s

Copy Game:

1485.91MB/s

Score Read:

1384Points

Score Write:

3046Points

Score Total:

5084Points

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:

7258MB/s

DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:

5750MB/s

DiskSpd seq_read:

3031MB/s

DiskSpd seq_write:

3704MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:

889MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:

356MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:

51.7MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:

96.7MB/s

DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:

7228MB/s

Drive Performance rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance rating - Percent

HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

90.1 pt Alienware 16 Aurora -11!

89.2 pt Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

82.6 pt Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

73.5 pt Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

65.7 pt Average of class Gaming

63.3 pt HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

50.2 pt Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

46.2 pt DiskSpd

seq readHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

5665 (5643.65min - 5664.83max) MB/s +87%Alienware 16 Aurora

4755 (2125.41min - 4755.22max) MB/s +57%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

4177 (4138.62min - 4177.35max) MB/s +38%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

3632 (3569.55min - 3631.92max) MB/s +20%Average of class Gaming (281 - 8300, n=128, last 2 years)

3479 MB/s +15%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

3449 (3429.05min - 3449.16max) MB/s +14%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

3031 (2761.74min - 3031.45max) MB/s Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (2540 - 3031, n=2)

2786 MB/s -8% seq writeAlienware 16 Aurora

5451 (2593.13min - 5450.5max) MB/s +47%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

5256 (5197.58min - 5255.67max) MB/s +42%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

5084 (5028.76min - 5083.81max) MB/s +37%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

4263 (4214.65min - 4263.16max) MB/s +15%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

4056 (4013.68min - 4056.1max) MB/s +10%Average of class Gaming (1454 - 9699, n=128, last 2 years)

3969 MB/s +7%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

3704 (3259.18min - 3704.34max) MB/s Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (2463 - 3704, n=2)

3084 MB/s -17% seq q8 t1 readHP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

7258 (6649.77min - 7257.61max) MB/s HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

7144 (6531.64min - 7143.5max) MB/s -2%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

7004 (5842.1min - 7004.24max) MB/s -3%Average of class Gaming (3193 - 15056, n=128, last 2 years)

6992 MB/s -4%Alienware 16 Aurora

6909 (5881.86min - 6908.88max) MB/s -5%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

6596 (6074.64min - 6596.19max) MB/s -9%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

6355 (5482.58min - 6355.29max) MB/s -12%Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (4747 - 7258, n=2)

6003 MB/s -17% seq q8 t1 writeSchenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

6947 (6936.12min - 6946.61max) MB/s +21%Alienware 16 Aurora

6304 (2594.86min - 6303.8max) MB/s +10%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

6117 (6097.29min - 6117.18max) MB/s +6%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

6103 (6005.82min - 6102.92max) MB/s +6%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

5750 (5600.99min - 5749.76max) MB/s Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

5708 (5613.35min - 5708.24max) MB/s -1%Average of class Gaming (1699 - 13519, n=128, last 2 years)

5648 MB/s -2%Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (4105 - 5750, n=2)

4928 MB/s -14% 4k q1 t1 readAlienware 16 Aurora

96.9 (96.48min - 96.89max) MB/s +87%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

96.1 (95.58min - 96.05max) MB/s +86%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

85 (84.17min - 84.96max) MB/s +64%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

76.5 (75.54min - 76.49max) MB/s +48%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

76.4 (75.42min - 76.36max) MB/s +48%Average of class Gaming (32.2 - 110.2, n=128, last 2 years)

69.1 MB/s +34%Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (51.7 - 53.9, n=2)

52.8 MB/s +2%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

51.7 (50.4min - 51.66max) MB/s 4k q1 t1 writeAlienware 16 Aurora

347 (335.86min - 346.66max) MB/s +259%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

335 (331.92min - 334.81max) MB/s +246%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

247 (242.52min - 246.64max) MB/s +155%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

234 (218.15min - 234.21max) MB/s +142%Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=128, last 2 years)

205 MB/s +112%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

157.6 (152.22min - 157.57max) MB/s +63%Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (96.7 - 111, n=2)

103.9 MB/s +7%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

96.7 (95.77min - 96.65max) MB/s 4k q32 t16 readHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

5399 (5342.26min - 5399.42max) MB/s +507%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

4170 (4166.07min - 4169.94max) MB/s +369%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

4137 (4111.19min - 4136.71max) MB/s +365%Alienware 16 Aurora

4100 (1658.77min - 4099.72max) MB/s +361%Average of class Gaming (417 - 8067, n=128, last 2 years)

2500 MB/s +181%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

1044 (1005.14min - 1043.59max) MB/s +17%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

889 (844.18min - 889.18max) MB/s Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (665 - 889, n=2)

777 MB/s -13% 4k q32 t16 writeLenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

4946 (4602min - 4946.25max) MB/s +1289%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

3371 (3357.07min - 3370.53max) MB/s +847%Alienware 16 Aurora

3353 (3331.54min - 3353.01max) MB/s +842%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

3054 (2391.68min - 3054.16max) MB/s +758%Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 5653, n=128, last 2 years)

2058 MB/s +478%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

540 (522.98min - 540.2max) MB/s +52%Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (356 - 371, n=2)

364 MB/s +2%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

356 (352.83min - 355.66max) MB/s AS SSD

Score TotalHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

10491 Points +106%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

9856 Points +94%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

8387 Points +65%Average of class Gaming (2912 - 13854, n=125, last 2 years)

6891 Points +36%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

6708 Points +32%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

5084 Points Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (3268 - 5084, n=2)

4176 Points -18% Score ReadLenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

4113 Points +197%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

3701 Points +167%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

3093 Points +123%Average of class Gaming (953 - 4418, n=125, last 2 years)

2332 Points +68%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

1694 Points +22%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

1384 Points Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (1155 - 1384, n=2)

1270 Points -8% Score WriteHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

4927 Points +62%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

4194 Points +38%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

3725 Points +22%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

3687 Points +21%Average of class Gaming (1136 - 7208, n=125, last 2 years)

3428 Points +13%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

3046 Points Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (1608 - 3046, n=2)

2327 Points -24% Seq ReadHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

5868.59 MB/s +28%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

5639 MB/s +23%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

5534.45 MB/s +20%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

5402.1 MB/s +18%Average of class Gaming (2272 - 9890, n=125, last 2 years)

5311 MB/s +16%Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (4595 - 5086, n=2)

4841 MB/s +5%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

4595 MB/s Seq WriteHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

5326.5 MB/s +64%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

5036.34 MB/s +55%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

4751 MB/s +46%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

4215.16 MB/s +30%Average of class Gaming (114.5 - 9926, n=125, last 2 years)

3915 MB/s +20%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

3249 MB/s Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (3043 - 3249, n=2)

3146 MB/s -3% 4K ReadLenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

88 MB/s +50%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

79.42 MB/s +35%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

78.73 MB/s +34%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

78.67 MB/s +34%Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 108.4, n=125, last 2 years)

68.5 MB/s +16%Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (58.8 - 59.5, n=2)

59.2 MB/s +1%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

58.8 MB/s 4K WriteHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

285.8 MB/s +51%Average of class Gaming (75.6 - 512, n=125, last 2 years)

216 MB/s +14%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

215.69 MB/s +14%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

198.4 MB/s +5%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

189.4 MB/s Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (138.5 - 189.4, n=2)

164 MB/s -13%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

75.56 MB/s -60% 4K-64 ReadLenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

3461 MB/s +300%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

3035.68 MB/s +251%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

2473.44 MB/s +186%Average of class Gaming (517 - 3630, n=125, last 2 years)

1734 MB/s +100%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

1062.12 MB/s +23%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

866 MB/s Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (587 - 866, n=2)

727 MB/s -16% 4K-64 WriteHP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

4108.09 MB/s +62%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

3556.26 MB/s +40%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

3146.3 MB/s +24%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

3013 MB/s +19%Average of class Gaming (850 - 5909, n=125, last 2 years)

2823 MB/s +11%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

2532 MB/s Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (1165 - 2532, n=2)

1849 MB/s -27% Access Time ReadHP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

0.098 ms * Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

0.075 ms * +23%Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (0.038 - 0.098, n=2)

0.068 ms * +31%Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.17, n=125, last 2 years)

0.05416 ms * +45%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

0.041 ms * +58%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

0.035 ms * +64%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

0.028 ms * +71% Access Time WriteAverage of class Gaming (0.012 - 0.277, n=125, last 2 years)

0.03818 ms * -74%Average Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 (0.022 - 0.03, n=2)

0.026 ms * -18%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngSamsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1

0.022 ms * Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N

0.021 ms * +5%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN

0.019 ms * +14%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

0.018 ms * +18%HP Omen 16 (2024)SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

0.017 ms * +23%* ... smaller is better

连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7228 (5964.95-7269.15) HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6983 (6099.15-7013.53) Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6573 (6108.16-6593.26) Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6303 (5373.37-6345.56) Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5490 (1238.79-7073.06) Alienware 16 Aurora ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3343 (2927-6898.79)

图形处理器性能RTX 5060 在英伟达（NVIDIA）额定功率极限下运行。在合成测试中，Omen 16 的平均表现恰到好处，而在实际游戏中，它的表现则名列前茅，与 NVIDIA®（英伟达™）公司的游戏性能不相上下。 联想Legion 5 15.

在 1080p/1200p 下，Omen 16 可以在最大设置下轻松处理大多数现代游戏，不过只有在轻度游戏或启用 DLSS 后才能达到 144 Hz 的刷新率。

DLSS 质量模式有助于在《博德之门 3》中保持原生帧率，并在许多情况下实现 QHD 游戏。

预计电池使用时 GPU 性能将下降约 27% (Fire Strike)。

3DMark 11

Time Spy

Fire Strike

3DMark Performance rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance rating - Percent

Average of class Gaming

100 pt Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260

86.5 pt Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250

85.8 pt Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

85.6 pt Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

81.8 pt HP Omen 16-ap0091ngNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

79.6 pt Alienware 16 AuroraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Intel Core 7 240H

74.8 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Average of class Gaming (13523 - 80022, n=140, last 2 years)

48442 Points +32%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260

41490 Points +13%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250

41341 Points +13%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

40784 Points +12%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (35895 - 41490, n=10)

39029 Points +7%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

36563 Points Alienware 16 AuroraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Intel Core 7 240H

36253 Points -1%3DMark

1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Gaming (6487 - 62849, n=153, last 2 years)

36188 Points +17%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

33399 Points +8%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260

33193 Points +7%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250

33014 Points +7%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (28050 - 33912, n=12)

31340 Points +1%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

30913 Points Alienware 16 AuroraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Intel Core 7 240H

29332 Points -5%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Gaming (2295 - 25984, n=150, last 2 years)

14988 Points +29%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260

12306 Points +6%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250

12135 Points +4%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

12052 Points +3%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (10262 - 12322, n=13)

11705 Points 0%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

11655 Points Alienware 16 AuroraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Intel Core 7 240H

10262 Points -12%

3DMark 11 Performance

30945 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score

58934 points3DMark Fire Strike Score

28480 points3DMark Time Spy Score

11484 pointsHelp... in comparison3DMark 11 in comparisonHP Stream 7 5700ng (min)

Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)183 ...MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU30831Lenovo Legion Slim 7 16APH8 R7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU30859Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 Ultra 7 255H, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop30916HP Omen 16-ap0091ng

R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop30945Aorus 17 XE4 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU31122Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51-71ER i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU31129Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU31157 ...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max)

R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 509082642

Blender

v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTXSchenker XMG Core 15 (M25)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

25 Seconds * -19%Alienware 16 AuroraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Intel Core 7 240H

24 Seconds * -14%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (21 - 25, n=10)

22 Seconds * -5%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250

21 Seconds * -0%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260

21 Seconds * -0%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

21 Seconds * Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=141, last 2 years)

19.1 Seconds * +9% v3.3 Classroom CUDAAverage NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (38 - 186, n=11)

52.8 Seconds * -39%Alienware 16 AuroraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Intel Core 7 240H

42 Seconds * -11%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

41 Seconds * -8%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250

38 Seconds * -0%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260

38 Seconds * -0%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

38 Seconds * Average of class Gaming (15 - 228, n=145, last 2 years)

33.1 Seconds * +13% v3.3 Classroom CPUAlienware 16 AuroraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Intel Core 7 240H

339 Seconds * -74%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250

328 Seconds * -68%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 260

290 Seconds * -49%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

281 Seconds * -44%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (173 - 387, n=10)

273 Seconds * -40%Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=142, last 2 years)

260 Seconds * -33%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

195 Seconds * * ... smaller is better

Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance rating - Percent

Average of class Gaming

99.1 pt HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

88.8 pt Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

88.6 pt Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

84.5 pt Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) -2! AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

83.5 pt Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

80.6 pt Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)

Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=147, last 2 years)

101.1 fps +17%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

90.8 (73.9min) fps +5%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

88.6 (71min) fps +2%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

86.6 (59min) fps Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

84.3 (69min) fps -3%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

80.1 (63.1min, 56.7P1) fps -8%Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T

Average of class Gaming (37.2 - 246, n=114, last 2 years)

133.9 fps +23%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

110.7 fps +1%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

109.1 fps Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

105.3 fps -3%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

101 (49.2min, 62.3P0.1, 91.9P1) fps -7%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

93.3 (73.6min, 74.1P0.1, 85.6P1) fps -14%GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x

HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

127.5 (2.93min, 83.3P1) fps Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=131, last 2 years)

125.3 fps -2%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

120.6 (3.82min, 90.9P1) fps -5%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

120.1 (9.15min, 83.3P1) fps -6%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

120 (7.07min, 76.9P1) fps -6%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

108.7 (8.82min, 76.9P1) fps -15%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality

Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=142, last 2 years)

136.9 fps +23%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

126 fps +14%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

118.1 fps +6%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

111 fps Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

109.5 fps -1%Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16

Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=129, last 2 years)

263 fps +21%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

235 (137.7min, 173.3P1) fps +8%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

223 (32.5min, 170P1) fps +2%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

217.8 (86.3min, 152.5P1) fps Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

191.1 (119.1min, 141.4P1) fps -12%Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking

HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

161.6 (132.4min) fps Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

156.1 (129.9min) fps -3%Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=146, last 2 years)

154.6 fps -4%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

144.6 (123.6min) fps -11%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

134.7 (114.7min) fps -17%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

121.5 (104.6min) fps -25%X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)

Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 150.2, n=149, last 2 years)

103.7 fps +10%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

93.9 fps Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

93.6 fps 0%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

92.4 fps -2%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

83.4 fps -11%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

72.1 fps -23%

F1 25

1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16xAverage of class Gaming (46.3 - 117.9, n=18, last 2 years)

71.7 fps +43%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

50 (10min, 29P1) fps Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (46.3 - 50, n=3)

47.5 fps -5%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

46.3 (10min, 32P1) fps -7%1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16xAverage of class Gaming (93 - 291, n=23, last 2 years)

181.8 fps +18%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

165.5 (60min, 118P1) fps +7%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (146 - 165.5, n=4)

154.6 fps 0%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

154 (23min, 96P1) fps Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

146 (13min) fps -5%1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16xAverage of class Gaming (96 - 308, n=23, last 2 years)

203 fps +16%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

177.1 (38min, 123P1) fps +1%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

174.9 (19min, 104P1) fps Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (152 - 190.4, n=4)

173.6 fps -1%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

152 (15min) fps -13%

赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø78.2 (74.1-78.9) Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø82.5 (77.1-83.6) Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø75.6 (72.4-76.9) Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø80 (76.1-80.8) Alienware 16 Aurora Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø72.9 (64.9-74.3)

lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD4K DLSS4KGTA V (2015)

184.1

181.1

176.3

127.5

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

221

187.6

184.2

161.6

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)

204

125.7

111

X-Plane 11.11 (2018)

135.6

112.2

93.9

Strange Brigade (2018)

492

303

238

217.8

155.7

83

Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)

155.8

125.2

110.4

109.1

114.3

75.5

63.8

Cyberpunk 2077 (2023)

121.1

109.2

95.3

86.6

65.2

56.1

F1 25 (2025)

189.8

174.9

154

25

排放与动力 - 在压力下保持冷静噪音在 "性能 "模式下，风扇通常在空闲时也会转动（约 27 分贝）。在平衡或环保模式下，风扇通常保持静音。在满载情况下，我们测得的分贝高达 52 分贝，不过游戏时通常保持在 49-50 分贝左右，整体表现一般至良好。

Noise level

Idle

23 / 23 / 27.64 dB(A)Load

49.5 / 52.73 dB(A)

30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud

min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A)

HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1HP Omen 16 (2024)GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101NLenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182NSchenker XMG Core 15 (M25)GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLBLenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGNAlienware 16 AuroraGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240HNoise-10%1%-4%-40%-1%off / environment * (dB)2325 -9%25.5 -11%24 -4%25 -9%22.9 -0%Idle Minimum * (dB)2329 -26%25.5 -11%25 -9%43 -87%24 -4%Idle Average * (dB)2330 -30%25.5 -11%27 -17%45 -96%25.6 -11%Idle Maximum * (dB)27.6431 -12%26.9 3%29 -5%48 -74%25.6 7%Load Average * (dB)49.546 7%34.6 30%48 3%53 -7%46.8 5%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)49.550.1 -1%49 1%51 -3%49.9 -1%Load Maximum * (dB)52.7347 11%50.1 5%50 5%53 -1%55.6 -5%Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)47* ... smaller is better

温度令人惊讶的是，Omen 16 即使在压力下也能保持低温。即使在长时间负载的情况下，表面温度也很少超过 37°C，效果极佳。

Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

32 °C34 °C33 °C 32 °C36 °C35 °C 19 °C21 °C21 °C

Maximum: 36 °CAverage: 29.2 °C

34 °C37 °C33 °C31 °C35 °C30 °C19 °C19 °C21 °C

Maximum: 37 °CAverage: 28.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 MiniMax. LoadIdleCyberpunk

29 °C30 °C29 °C 28 °C29 °C28 °C 26 °C23 °C27 °C

Maximum: 30 °CAverage: 27.7 °C

32 °C32 °C30 °C32 °C32 °C30 °C27 °C28 °C28 °C

Maximum: 32 °CAverage: 30.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 24 °C | Room Temperature 18.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 MiniMax. LoadIdleCyberpunk

31 °C33 °C32 °C 31 °C36 °C35 °C 21 °C22 °C21 °C

Maximum: 36 °CAverage: 29.1 °C

31 °C34 °C31 °C31 °C35 °C29 °C20 °C20 °C21 °C

Maximum: 35 °CAverage: 28 °C Power Supply (max.) 46 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).

Stresstest 顶部

Stresstest 交流适配器

Stresstest 底部

HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 LaptopHP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPULenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 LaptopSchenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 LaptopLenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 LaptopHeat-12%-11%-21%-23%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)3647 -31%42.2 -17%49 -36%49 -36%Maximum Bottom * (°C)3757 -54%51.7 -40%59 -59%58 -57%Idle Upper Side * (°C)3025 17%28.5 5%28 7%32 -7%Idle Bottom * (°C)3226 19%29.2 9%31 3%29 9%* ... smaller is better

发言人立体声扬声器很弱，声音太小，缺乏低音，甚至中高音也不突出。耳机插孔位于左侧中部，非常方便。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)HP Omen 16-ap0091ng audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.91 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 38% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 47% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量插入外接显示器会激活专用 GPU，从而增加空闲功耗。在负载情况下，功耗略高于平均水平。效率并不是它的强项，但 230 瓦的电源适配器大小适中。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.09 / 1 WattIdle 7.8 / 8.8 / 21.5 Watt

Load

119 / 208 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

HP Omen 16-ap0091ngGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182NSchenker XMG Core 15 (M25)GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLBLenovo LOQ 15AHP10GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGNAlienware 16 AuroraGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240HAverage of class Gaming Power Consumption12%-1%-30%8%-46%Idle Minimum * (Watt)7.86.9 12%10.6 -36%20 -156%4.4 44%13.5 ?(3.9 - 41.5, n=125, last 2 years) -73%Idle Average * (Watt)8.810.7 -22%12.1 -38%20.7 -135%18 -105%19.3 ?(6.5 - 53.5, n=125, last 2 years) -119%Idle Maximum * (Watt)21.511.3 47%15.9 26%22.7 -6%18.2 15%25.8 ?(7.5 - 57.9, n=125, last 2 years) -20%Load Average * (Watt)11969.7 41%95 20%71 40%87.1 27%110.9 ?(59.3 - 201, n=122, last 2 years) 7%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)192162.6 15%169 12%153.1 20%123 36%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)164.5165 -0%165 -0%151.1 8%120.6 27%Load Maximum * (Watt)208233.6 -12%192 8%172 17%183 12%260 ?(122 - 431, n=125, last 2 years) -25%* ... smaller is better

耗电量 赛博朋克 / Stresstest

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø178 (161.44-212.89) HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø17 (9.012-28.878) HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø192.1 (168.36-201.72)

带外部监视器时的耗电量

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø94.9 (92.08-120.03) HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103.5 (94.29-121.45) HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø95.1 (82.09-122.09) HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø161.3 (147.46-176.63) HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø26.4 (17.347-34.44) HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø164.5 (161.25-168.08)

电池寿命70 Wh 的电池相对较小--除了...... LOQ 15的竞争对手，如 Legion 5或以前的 Omen 型号有 80 Wh 或更多。在没有电源插座的情况下，轻度使用（浏览网页或播放电影）大约需要 5 小时。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

4h 57min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

5h 07min

Load (maximum brightness)

1h 20min

HP Omen 16-ap0091ngR9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 70 WhHP Omen 16 (2024)i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 WhLenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 WhSchenker XMG Core 15 (M25)Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 99.8 WhLenovo LOQ 15AHP10R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 WhAlienware 16 AuroraCore 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 96 WhAverage of class Gaming Battery runtime18%70%98%-5%50%35%H.264 (h)5.111.5 125%8.1 ?(2.15 - 15, n=39, last 2 years) 59%WiFi v1.3 (h)55.9 18%9.7 94%9.9 98%4.5 -10%7.5 50%6.78 ?(1.967 - 14.8, n=127, last 2 years) 36%Load (h)1.31.2 -8%1.3 0%1.43 ?(0.767 - 2.73, n=56, last 2 years) 10%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h)0.9Reader / Idle (h)6.99.62 ?(3.12 - 21.5, n=26, last 2 years)

Back to the verdict

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng

- 10/07/2025 v8

Christian Hintze

Chassis86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard89%

Pointing Device88%

Connectivity56 / 80 → 70%

Weight60 / 10-68 → 87%

Battery61 / 95 → 64%

Display79%

Games Performance87%

Application Performance86%

AI Performance91%

Temperature93 / 95 → 98%

Noise75 / 90 → 83%

Audio73%

Camera42 / 75 → 56%

Average67%

83%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions50%Materials40%Packaging50%Power Use78.7%Repairability42%Software Updates22.3% Total Sustainability Score: 47.2%

可比较的替代品

ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay

1.82.5%HP Omen 16-ap0091ngAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘16 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $16.99Fleshy Leaf CPU+GPU Cooling ...2. $19.99BestParts New CPU+GPU Coolin...3. $23.59LAOKOEN New Cooling Fan for ...List Price: 1500 Euro2.4 kg23.7 mm16.00"1920x1200162 PPIIPS

2.86.7% v7 (old)HP Omen 16 (2024)Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,288.00HP Omen 16 2024 Gaming Lapto...2. $1,268.89HP OMEN 16 inch Laptop, FHD ...3. $1,268.88HP Omen 16 2024 Gaming Lapto...List Price: 3200 Euro2.4 kg23.5 mm16.10"2560x1440182 PPIIPS

3.87.2%Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $26.95YFLAPFAN (1 Pair) New CPU GP...2. $1,499.95Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10 RTX ...3. $39.99L20C4PC0 L20D4PC0 L20L4PC0 L...List Price: 1449€1.9 kg21.5 mm15.10"2560x1600200 PPIOLED

4.84.7%Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25)AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDList Price: 1840 EUR1.9 kg22 mm15.30"2560x1600197 PPIIPS

5.77.5%Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,359.00Lenovo LOQ RTX 5060 Gaming L...2. $1,049.99Lenovo LOQ 15 AI Gaming Lapt...3. $1,389.00Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15...2.4 kg24 mm15.60"1920x1080141 PPIIPS

6.76.2%Alienware 16 AuroraIntel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘32 GB MemoryAmazon: 1. $999.99Alienware 16 Aurora Gaming L...2. $1,149.99Alienware 16 Aurora Laptop A...3. $2,249.00Dell Alienware 16X Aurora Ga...List Price: 1100 USD2.6 kg15.2 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS

More articles related to this deviceHP Omen 16-ap0091ng (Omen 16 Series)Magazine•预兆 16》：经济实惠的游戏机，控制中心广告满天飞 |News•今年预兆玩家的重大变化--惠普预兆 16 评测 |Review•惠普 Omen 16 (2024) 评测：配备酷睿 i9 和 RTX 4080 的 QHD 游戏笔记本，售价 3,200 欧元 |Review•惠普 Omen 16 笔记本电脑评测：Zen 4 也是游戏玩家的不错选择 |Review•惠普Omen 16 2023笔记本电脑回顾：145 WGeForce RTX 4080性能 |Review•Radeon RX 6650M性能首次亮相。惠普Omen 16 2022笔记本电脑评测 |Review•HP Omen 16 (2022)回顾。具有高分辨率165赫兹显示屏的光滑的游戏笔记本电脑 |Review•惠普Omen 16游戏笔记本电脑评测。少即是多 |Review•惠普Omen 16笔记本电脑回顾。强大的RTX 3070游戏笔记本有不必要的缺点

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Christian Hintze - Managing Editor - 2196 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2016Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 688091 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!